Why Don’t We Have Flying Car in 2022?

Fuel Consumption Aircraft VS Car

The idea of a vehicle capable of flying across the town has existed since the ’80s. The idea is so popular, it even becomes a trope in every mainstream science fiction movie. In Back to The Future Movie, they predicted flying cars will be common in 2015. It’s 2021, and I don’t see a single flying car yet. There are several reasons why we don’t have a flying car yet. However, the main idea is it is a really bad idea to have it with our current technology.

We actually have things that could be considered a flying car: a small aircraft. Small aircraft could have several people on board, and it could fly. Yet, it is expensive, and it has bad fuel efficiency. For example, a typical Cessna aeroplane has 1 pilot and 3 passengers’ capacity. It is similar to your car. According to this website, small plane with 65 HP requires 2.5 to 3 gallons per hour. The basic Cessna 172 has 145 hp, twice more than the size of the 65hp aircraft. This means the Cessna will consume 7 to 8 gallons of fuel per hour. It also requires a large amount of area to land and takes off. The typical Honda Civic could have 74 Km per gallon. This comparison shows that aircraft is totally not fuel and space-efficient method to do your transport. This is why almost everyone today chooses a land vehicle rather than buying their personal aircraft.

The closest thing to a flying car is a manned drone. In November 2021, South Korea successfully. However, the drone is only capable of a 30–50 Km range.

The problem why the drone can’t travel so far is energy storage. This energy storage problem is actually the biggest problem that prevents us from having a drone capable of travelling between cities. Battery is heavier than liquid fuel. A vehicle will be lighter and have more energy capacity using fossil fuel. Battery can’t yet store the same amount of energy in a combustion engine. Our hope for this energy problem is an SSB, a Solid-State Battery.

In a nutshell, SSB is not using a liquid electrolyte as in your smartphone and laptop right now. This system will make the battery way more efficient, have a faster charging time, and store more energy. Toyota, Nissan and Tesla currently develop this technology. Until this technology become mainstream, we will never see a ubiquitous use of a manned drone.

We don’t have a flying car yet in 2022 because we don’t have the technology yet. Flying requires way more energy than using a land vehicle. As long as we can’t improve a cheap, reliable electric battery, we will never see this method in the near future.




Language, Tech and Food.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Is the Metaverse Our Post-Web Future? Probably Not.

The Truth About Investors’ Money and the Startup Scene

Re Humanising + Re Connecting + Re Membering

Is virtual land a good investment? Here’s why investors are rushing virtual land over physical land

plagues, aliens, and artificial intelligence… by an optimist (of sorts)

Optimizing our Urban settings: Future of Cities

New Year’s Robolutions

The challenges that plague India: The unrealized potential

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Ahmad Zaidi

Ahmad Zaidi

Language, Tech and Food.

More from Medium

Don’t Blink

Pepsi’s Legendary Navy

The Acambaro figures

The Invasion of Ukraine Proves that the West hasn't lost its Old Mindset